Re: captive portal implementation found lacking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2015 09:52 PM, David Airlie wrote:

Hey devs,

So Simo wanted to explode so I've tried to distill down the issues we saw:

a: you can't uninstalled the config connectivity package from workstation without losing gnome-shell and gdm.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205963


I re-assigned that bug to gnome-shell, which is where the dependency is actually coming from. There's also a dependency in fedora-release-workstation, which I think is more defensible but is able to be worked around while still keeping gnome installed (e,g. by replacing fedora-release-workstation with fedora-release-nonproduct).


this seems sub optimal.

b: the feature is over zealous in its letting you know it can't find fp.org


Agreed. There's a FESCo discussion and ruling on the feature at [1] which kind of fizzled out. I think it's worth following up there and through the aforementioned bug to follow through with the FESCo decision "AGREED: Ask Workstation to rethink how to pull the package in with the goal of easily enabling people to opt out (+5, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 17:47:38)"

Rich

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1337
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux