Re: [Fedora-packaging] bundling of jemalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/21/2015 01:00 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try
"strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly
with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin).

Why isn't this recorded in the RPM provides (and why is there no mention
of jemalloc in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries)?  Are
there any other known cases outside Mozilla products?  I found bug
788500 about unbundling jemalloc from redis.

If jemalloc would be its own package, we would probably use that for
nfs-ganesha too. Currently glibc/malloc is used, but jemalloc is well
tested by the nfs-ganesha community and could have some benefits. I have
not checked the sources of jemalloc, so I can not say if I would be
a suitable maintainer for it.

Niels

There already is a jemalloc package. Whether it is the same as what is in other packages is unknown. firefox and xulrunner should have a note about bundled jemalloc.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux