On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Seems like it's easier to just ditch grubby than patch it, if it takes > years to merge patches to provide simple functionality that other > distro's already have then we just need to drop it and go with some > other solution. Thanks, Linux has more bootloaders, distro derivatives (made mutually incompatible for sport), and configuration file formats than you and I both have fingers and toes. I can count Microsoft and Apple total for all device categories on one hand. Grubby is effectively the marriage counselor for this bootloader insane asylum we have on Linux. So I don't actually think it's easier to ditch grubby unless there's political will to pick one bootloader. One configuration file format. And a handful of supported bootable layouts. And also get FESCo a 12 month supply of earplugs to help avoid the ensuing ire of users whose favorite nutty layout is no longer supported. -- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
