----- Original Message ----- > On 03/18/2015 12:55 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > How are "disabled repositories" going to be approved for inclusion? > > While you likely meant political meaning of "how", I would like share how it > will be done technically. > > Approximately 6 months ago Env&Stack wanted to have "Playground repository", > which would be set of Copr repositories. > Something guaranteed to meet legal requirements, something with sufficient > quality. Copr already have this attribute for > every project and admins of Copr can set/unset this flag. > You can already enable those repositories by: > dnf playground enable > if you have dnf-plugins-core. Unfortunately this set is currently empty :) > > Half a year ago the blocker for Env&Stack was that Copr can not sign > packages. Copr can do that for few weeks now and I > notified Env&Stack so they can continue on they work on Playground > repository. > > This is IMO ideal candidate for disabled repositories with enabled metadata. Yep, I raised it on the Council meeting and these two proposals work pretty well together! Jaroslav > I am not sure how to deliver those disable repositories though. But that is > likely for different discussion. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS > Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
