On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:13:06 +0000 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse > <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we > > concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've > > reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta. > > > > The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f22 > > updates-testing. Am I right in thinking that we *don't* need to > > bump the epoch in order to go back to 1.2.0, and that testers > > should expect to have to use 'distro-sync' occasionally instead of > > just 'update'? > > > > I suppose we can bump the epoch if we have to (it's already > > non-zero, after all), but my first inclination is always to try to > > avoid doing so. > > If you've pushed them out to people you'll need to bump the epoch, > expecting people to run distro-sync isn't a fix and there's other > processes that don't have that functionality (secondary arch builds > amongst other things) to deal with it. Yep. Epoch bump time. kevin
Attachment:
pgprnjyvnllDq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
