On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > > Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to > >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. > >> > >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather > >> than later as rawhide is currently a big game of whack-a-mole when > >> building c++ packages. > > As soon as gcc folks say things are settled down enough to do one, we > > can look at scheduling one. ;) > > > > It would be a shame to do it too soon though and have a bug requiring > > another one. > > > > I've been rebuilding things as I run into them being broken. > > (The other day it was the gobby stack: net6, libxml++, obby, gobby). > Is it ok to rebuild all dependencies f.e. for fix build issue with > pfstools introduced by that update? Or just fill bugzilla issues for owners? If a simple rebuild works, I'd say go ahead and do it. If it's more complicated, file a bug and attach any necessary patches (and ask the POC if you can act on it yourself). That's what I usually do. Regards, -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
