Re: Failed to load vesa with undefined symbol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Jackson composed on 2015-03-03 16:21 (UTC-0500):

> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 14:29 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:

>> Adam Jackson composed on 2015-03-03 14:09 (UTC-0500):

>> > Aw dang, someone still actually uses vesa.

>> Isn't vesa the better remaining option for those whose "native" driver got
>> orphaned (e.g. mga, sis)?

> I was expressing dismay that that set remains non-empty, yes.

I recognized that it was, but was asking a serious question. I googled "vesa
vs. fbdev" before writing. My question has apparently been asked often, but I
found no actual answer saying whether one might ever be preferable to the
other, and no mention at all of the modesetting driver. Changing the search
to "vesa fbdev modesetting" mostly found (EE) excerpts from Xorg.0.log and
subsequent directions to ATI/Intel/NVidia users to ignore them and/or
uninstall them.
-- 
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux