Am 28.02.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR <alipoor90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You can edit that file,The file in /usr will be overwritten by the next package update.create your own in /etc/sysctl.d/,Yes, local configuration belongs to /etc. See also "man sysctl.d".Except, of course, that it is apparently Leonard Pottering's announced desire to stop people from using /etc/
stop that trolling *local* CONFIGURATIONS belong to /etc and nothing elseLennarts point is that any defaults and package data don't belong there and he is not completly wrong in that context - in the best case you would have a operating system with *nothing* in /etc and any package shipped stuff can have a *override* file with the same name in /etc
at the end this would also obsolete all that rpmnew / rpmsave stuff just because files from packages would no longer be touched by a user but *completly* ignored from the moment there is a replacement in /etc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
