On 02/27/2015 12:57 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless.
Sound good.
J.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
(just like they do with other JVMs).
That's right.
In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
removed" - must be added.
J.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
