On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Small restart. > > Looking to the discussion, although many people claimed "against any > rules" at the end it seems to me that everybody agree on "some rules" - > even if it would be existence of metapackage or only removed virtual > provides and priority.... > From that point of view, do you mind to help me to improve those rules? As always I'm happy to help improving state of Java in Fedora. Next week I'm on vacation [1], but after I come back I can work on this. Once we agree on requirements and other assumptions then finding optimal solution should be easy. [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/vacation/#m2268 -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
