Why is k3b still at 0.11.14?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
:
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Why is k3b still at 0.11.14?
From
: dragoran <
dragoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:36:36 +0100
List-archive
: <
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list
>
List-help
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help
>
List-id
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>
Reply-to
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
User-agent
: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041113)
Why is k3b 0.11.17 still not in rawhide?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Why is k3b still at 0.11.14?
From:
Matthew Miller
Prev by Date:
[Dump-users] preliminary EA/ACL support in dump/restore (fwd)
Next by Date:
Re: RFC: root/non-root bash prompts different colours?
Previous by thread:
[Dump-users] preliminary EA/ACL support in dump/restore (fwd)
Next by thread:
Re: Why is k3b still at 0.11.14?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Formulas]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel Development]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
