On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Fellow Contributors! > > [...] > It's possible down the road that, if there is no community interest in > i686, the project might look at other options such as making i686 a > secondary architecture. This is not because we want to drive away > 32-bit users; but we're passionate about making the Fedora kernel work > well for the majority of our user base. This prioritization helps us > get closer to that goal. Just to make this clear because this has suggestion has been brought up multiple times ... while there might be less interests in running a i686 kernel the story is very different for i686 user space (mostly libraries but also applications like wine) even on a x86_64 host kernel. So don't draw a line from "no interests in i686 kernel" to "no interesst in the i686 architecture and therefore it should be secondary" .. its not as simple as with a completely isolated architecture like ppc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
