Open bug please. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I just messed up and did: > > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade > > and upgraded everything instead of just the thing I was trying to > upgrade. I want to undo that, but it seems to be impossible. > > # dnf history undo 119 > [...] > No package libreoffice-base-1:4.3.5.2-11.fc21.x86_64 available. > Error: An operation cannot be undone > > # dnf distro-sync > Using metadata from Tue Feb 24 17:15:49 2015 > Error: package ghostscript-x11-9.15-6.fc21.x86_64 requires > ghostscript(x86-64) = 9.15-6.fc21, but none of the providers can be > installed > > Gee, thanks. > > As it happens, # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing works. Perhaps # dnf > distro-sync could suggest --allow-erasing. > > Also, there's a bug here: > > # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing > [...] > Transaction Summary > ================================================================================ > Downgrade 132 Packages > > Total download size: 186 M > Is this ok [y/N]: y > > So I shouldn't have needed --allowerasing in the first place. > > An alternative would be to add a most that undoes the last transaction > and updates at the same time. That way it could undo my accidental > transaction but only depend on versions of packages that still exist > in updates. > > --Andy > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
