Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive for me: Qt4 All LXQt for now is Qt5 based. []'s On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: >> >> Yes >> >> We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and >> with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued >> 0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ). >> >> For the spin, we had a small discussion on default applications, with >> are a mixed feeling between keep light enough or usable from the >> start. >> >> Keep light enough means use non usual browsers, text editors, and this >> would make a spin non-attractive but very low memory consumption. >> >> Keep usable, means even been LXQt, we could go with kwrite as text >> editor, firefox as browser, and go on. >> >> We would appreciate any input from the list as well to follow proper >> directions on this. >> > FWIW, I've got an SRPM for lximage-qt lying around [1]. > > qupzilla might be worth considering as the browser (being qt based and slim > in dependencies), the Fedora package is somewhat out of date though. > > > [1] https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/lximage-qt-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
