On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: >> I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then without any >> rules. But not setting >> them will bring chaos for majority of users. > > I have a question: Is there anybody that stepped in to maintain the legacy jdk? > If there is nobody to maintain it trying to come up with this guidelines now would be pointless. > In short I think that such guidelines would better be created *only* when there are interested parties, jointly with them and the process is played a bit by some copr repo or similar. Purely theoretical work is not needed. I fully agree with Alex here. I would add that if someone really wants to maintain older JDK in Fedora then it should up to *them* to come up with a solution that will work and satisfy expectations of JKD maintainers and Java SIG. Maintaining package is more than clicking "unorphan" in pkgdb. -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
