On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 02:33 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2015-02-16 at 23:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > - A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push > > > GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1] > > > > They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default > > C++ ABI to avoid having to rebuild everything C++ this late in the cycle. > > Other GCC 5 changes can still cause breakage though. > > Are you saying, we will have GCC 5 on F22 and not have a mass rebuild > for GCC ? I think we will have a mass rebuild for F22 and we will have a > short time to fix the build fails. Yes, and no: http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora/ -- Yaakov Selkowitz Associate Software Engineer, ARM Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
