On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:59:06 +0100 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800 > > Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > as has happened many times before, the GCC bump in rawhide has > > > broken all Fortran packages, desperately needing a mass rebuild. > > > > Can you expand on the breakage? Is it that they no longer rebuild? > > Or that they no longer run? > > I think, he's talking about the fact they are segfaulting… ;) Well, thats not really clear to me at least. "broken" is pretty generic and vuage. > > > Unfortunately, rpm is blissfully unaware of any breakage happening > > > (BZ #1192617) so maintainers won't even know when this breakage > > > happens. > > > > > > Before I start rebuilding packages, are there any plans to do the > > > rebuilds soon..? I think the plan was to do one in rawhide as soon as gcc5 is ready. So, likely sometime in the next few weeks perhaps? > > > > There is no mass rebuild this cycle. It would be good to isolate the > > scope here and see what needs to be rebuilt. Do you have a list of > > all affected packages or a way to come up with one? > > Why is mass rebuild skipped this time? Not enough time in the cycle. > For this particular case it is: repoquery --whatrequires libgfortran But it sounds like it's a subset of these (only those with .mod files) that are actually affected? So, something like: % repoquery -qf /usr/lib64/gfortran/modules/\*.mod | sort | uniq elpa-mpich-devel-0:2013.11-5.008.fc22.x86_64 elpa-openmpi-devel-0:2013.11-5.008.fc22.x86_64 getdata-devel-0:0.8.6-1.fc22.x86_64 grib_api-devel-0:1.13.0-1.fc22.x86_64 hdf5-devel-0:1.8.14-1.fc22.x86_64 healpix-devel-0:2.13a-15.fc22.x86_64 libxc-devel-0:2.1.0-4.fc22.x86_64 netcdf-fortran-devel-0:4.4.1-1.fc22.x86_64 plplot-fortran-devel-0:5.10.0-17.fc22.x86_64 qd-devel-0:2.3.15-1.fc22.x86_64 wannier90-devel-0:2.0.0-3.fc22.x86_64 And then I suppose everything that buildrequires them? kevin
Attachment:
pgpTl9U086ZMw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
