On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:32:57 -0600 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: ...snip... > KF> Additionally, FPC folks have done a great job recently (mostly due > KF> to Tibbs hard work) in catching up with their backlog. Bundling > KF> requests I would think would be much quicker than in the past. > > I appreciate the shoutout but James has been doing a ton of work too. Thanks to both of you! (and the other FPC folks) > Anyway, I think we're going to do much better with not letting things > fall through the cracks, and to update when things don't get discussed > in a meeting. However, nothing is going to help the tickets sitting > in needinfo. We can't track down all of the requested information > ourselves. > > KF> Some ideas about the review queue: > > Honestly I would really, really like to have a completely separate > discussion about the review queue. Getting things hung up on bundling > isn't the best way to make easy progress on any of the other issues. Sure. agreed. It just seemed like this proposal was two parts: relaxing bunding and reviews. > > KF> * Get some pool of people interested in being triage for the > KF> queue. ie, check that things build, run fedora-review on them, > KF> point submittors to how to get sponsored docs, close old reviews > KF> with no response, etc. > > Easy: Most ofhis stuff needs to be submitted initially. I would ping > and eventually close any review tickets where the submitter hasn't > provided this information. > > And I have done this in the past; it's pretty thankless. Now that I'm > mostly done cleaning up FPC stuff I might be able to find some time to > garden the review queue, but I certainly wouldn't get in the way of > anyone else wanting to do it. I think a lot of this could be automated. If our bugzilla to fedmsg connector finally appears we could even do it then. ie, new review submmited gets a fedmsg that a bot/script checks the new review, asks for missing stuff, runs various checks, etc. > > KF> * Moving reviews out of bugzilla has been proposed and some work I > KF> think has been done for an app to do that. > > Bugzilla is merely a sort-of-convenient place to put reviews and it > provides something we can bodge into a workflow, but I don't think > anyone would complain if it moved somewhere else and if more things > were automated. I suppose fedora-review itself could also grow a way > to submit a reasonable review to bugzilla if someone hasn't already > written a tool to do that. Yeah, with a review app we could do a lot of checking up front and only submit the actual review once it passed that. kevin
Attachment:
pgpmRbwA2DZui.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
