Re: Un-retiring ice and mumble?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> Devel,
> 
> I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice.
> 
> I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort.
> So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them
> unless anyone objects.
> 
> Is there any reason ice was orphaned and retired other than
> lack of interest?
> 
> Cheers,
> Carlos.

I can confirm that mumble builds on F21 and the client seems to work (I 
haven't really exercised it fully, or anything else at all) after updating 
it to the current release 1.2.8. The patch is a bit long to include inline, 
so it's here:

https://gist.github.com/kythyria/a7474d32daa994a781c2

I disregarded the retiring commit, changed the version to 1.2.8, and removed 
a patch that was already merged upstream and thus causing patch(1) to 
complain.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux