Re: Proposal to (formally/easily) allowing multiple versions of the same library installable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 13.02.2015 um 21:42 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
I'm not sure if things will be (much) worse than the current situation.
Maintainers already do maintain multiple versions of the same library,
and also the upgrade path from a Fedora release to the next should work.
My assumption was that the effort needed to properly package libfoo3 for
F21, is not more than what is already needed when you package it for
Rawhide/F22

but you miss that in Rawhide *only that* version is packaged and any other package is linked aganst *that one* so there are no collisions and dependecie issues possible

haveing the same library in different versions in the same release is a complete other world and at the end not maintainable

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux