Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > 2. No reviews are required for new libfooX packages (as it is not > required right now when you update your libfoo package I disagree with this point, reviews are important, arguably *more* important in special cases like parallel-installable libraries. > For -devel packages, two methods can be allowed: > 1. Simple: -devel packages conflict with each other, so while you can > have multiple versions of libfoo installed, you can have only a single > version of libfoo-devel installed > 2. Flexible: Provide the possibility of installing multiple -devel > versions, and a method to select the "default" one, like the > alternatives system. +1 for option 2, option 1 is bad, there be dragons. Though there are many opportunities for bikeshedding, the rest of your proposal seems reasonable. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
