Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/13/2015 10:56 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:

Modified version of Zbyszek's idea with time constraints follows:

1) Accept the new package into Fedora N even with bundled libraries.

I am inclined to be Fedora needs to encounter a serious vulnerability originating from bundling, such that you guys comprehend, why bundling is utterly stupid ;)


For those who don't know what I am talking about:
Many years ago (IIRC, ~1999), nobody cared about static linkage or bundling. At this time, it was common to statically link and/or bundle libraries.

Then a critically vulnerability was found in libz affecting all Linux distros. Nobody knew which packages all bundled and/or statically linked against different versions of libz. It took months for all Linux distributions to identify their vulnerable packages, to find solutions and to release security-fixes.

Meanwhile, we've had much more critical vulnerablities in widely used libs (Remember heartbleed), which all have been quite easy to fix packaging-wise. IMO, to a great portion, thanks to having mostly banned static linkage and bundling.

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux