On 12 February 2015 at 12:53, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Qui, 2015-02-12 at 14:41 -0500, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> Aka patience and to be totally honest and blunt, if you have a
> alpha/beta tester group and or a solid forum/mailing list with updates
> to status this should seriously not be a setback 3 weeks on the other
> hand might qualify.....Appreciate the eagerness to partake in
> development /packaging but things happen from time to time learn to
> roll with the tides as they say
yeah, but we should have some regularity, I don't like waiting without
knowing the delay, in this case is pushing to stable, is just for my
organization, to see what is in stable and what let in testing, and I
have been patient.
I realize we haven't have a branch in a while due to the long Fedora 20 cycle, but this is how things are done usually after a branch.. there can be up to a week delay for pushes as various things get ironed out.
But when someone else send a package to testing and I want test it, if
we don't have a push to testing, force me download packages manually .
The point here is push to testing should be more quickly than push to
stable .
Thanks ,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
