On 12/02/15 16:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
Malware can easily binary patch firefox to ignore verification, I do not think trying to defeat sideloading with this kind of verification makes much sense. Of course you may decide to exempt only extensions in non-user-writable locations, if you are on Linux and the Firefox binary is read-only for the user.
Besides the technical issues, what does upstream permit? Since we havn't re-branded firefox, are we free to modify this whatever way we want? I can see the argument for upstream to limit such modifications without re-branding.
Cheers! --alec -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
