On 02/10/2015 07:05 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Well, wouldn't you agree that developers should be able to read warnings > and filter out the serious one? If a project has more than a screen-full of "harmless" warnings, then it's very easy to miss when a serious one slips in. I prefer -Werror so that nothing gets by, all warnings must be considered. It's not that much of a burden after you first get to a warning-free build. I could see the argument that this approach belongs in upstream development, not so much distro packaging. I still think it's useful to know that any patches applied are warning-free too though. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
