----- Original Message ----- > > > So, at today's FESCo meeting there was a good deal of discussion about > > > python as default: > > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-28/fesco.2015-01-28-18.02.log.html#l-41 > > > > > > in which we agreed defer this to F23, file bugs against rawhide after > > > branch (+6,0,0) > > > > I really don't get this. I was over the log and didn't find a compelling > > argument as to why this should be postponed. Can someone sum the arguments > > up, please? > > Let me try, based on my understanding of the conversation: whatever the > technical changes / progress in migration are (and the actual migration can > of course technically be staged over time), we can only have a public > announcement (and PR) that “Python 3 is now the default” once. We do have > some flexibility in what that announcement means, but it should be enough so > that we will never need to follow up with a “Python 3 is now really the > default, trust us this time” Change/announcement. > > FESCo felt that not “enough” has been ported yet (in particular that the > default install will not be ported by F22, and that Anaconda is unlikely to > make it), hence postponing the Change / announcement aspct. > Mirek Thanks, that makes sense. Some questions: - What if Anaconda does make it? :) - What is "enough"? It's possible that two or three packages may be still unported even in F23 (and as for server livecd in F23, I think there will be few more). - So is it ok if I file bugs for all components that I know are upstream-compatible with Python 3 (bugs to get them switched, I mean)? Slavek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
