On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > So - I have no objections to consolidating, but I do wonder if the > AtomicHost one is explicit enough. Some folks were expressing confusion > about what the change was, exactly. (I forget who, it was either in > #fedora-cloud or #atomic.) Right, I agree that the Bare metal and Vagrant pages have more content, but I could merge the details into the AtomicHost change. > I think FESCo is currently looking them over as well - have they asked > for a consolidation, or...? I don't want to throw a spanner in their > process. They didn't ask, but I looked at the FESCO backlog and thought this would help =) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
