Re: Is it a SELinux policy problem ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:11:35PM +0100, Casper wrote:
> > Or is it a luajit problem ?
> > 
> > Dear devs hello.
> > I would like to determine if these AVC are caused by prosody, lua, or
> > a wrong SELinux policy.
> 
>   That would be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150106
> As Dan pointed out, this should be fixed in latest selinux-policy.
> Please test and provide feedback at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.13.1-105.fc21
Works for me, thanks for your help 

> 
>   Nb. prosody got orphaned recently. You should think about migrating
> to other XMPP server or becoming a maintainer.
I'm thinking to maintain prosody but for now I'm trying to update
packages on my local repo, and if I success I will apply in pkgdb.


-- 
Autorité de Certification: http://casperlefantom.net/root.pem
Empreinte: 0975 864A 2036 0F94 A139  114A D32E 8EBE 30F2 2429

Clef GPG ID: 83288189 @ hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org
Empreinte: CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912  7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189

Attachment: pgp8rcmZtvJeX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux