Am 27.01.2015 um 21:18 schrieb Dan Williams:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 20:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:there is a usecase for NM, surely, but not for me and not for a lot of other people working professional in serious setups and tend to configure personal workstations left and right as much as possible ike the production environment frankly i have enough of "change for the sake of change" as well i won't use notebooks or other "mobile devices" for serious tasks for the rest of my life - periodNetworkManager is not intended only for mobile devices or notebooks, because that's a small part of the networking story. Plus, more than just notebooks have needs for the things that NetworkManager brings to the table. If it's useful for you, that's great. If you do not find it useful, that's also fine, and it can be masked. However, we have put great effort into NM so that even if it *is* enabled, it can coexist peacefully with whatever you do on the system outside of NM, and we are constantly improving this. We hope that NM can be installed on most systems, and will be there when required and useful, but will get out of the way when not required
i am fine with thatbut i am not fine with the unacceptable attitude of the thread-starter asking when things get removed which are mature and perfect working because i have *zero* understanding for the "remove this and that and replace whatever can be replaced" attitude the last recent years at all
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
