On 26 January 2015 at 15:16, Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/26/2015 02:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: >> >> On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is >>>>> 11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see the >>>>> Ubuntu >>>>> update with .440 package but what's that? >>>>> >>>>> ma. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ >>>>> [2] https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ >>>> >>>> >>>> flash-plugin-11.2.202.440 is available in the yum repo hosted by >>>> Adobe. But on[1] it doesn't say anything about the issue being fixed >>>> for Linux. >>> >>> >>> Sure it does "Adobe Flash Player 11.2.202.438 and earlier versions for >>> Linux" ... 440 > 438 ... >> >> From >> https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-01.html: >> >> "UPDATE (January 24): Users who have enabled auto-update for the Flash >> Player desktop runtime will be receiving version 16.0.0.296 beginning >> on January 24. This version includes a fix for CVE-2015-0311" >> >> I was thinking of something along those lines for the Linux version too. >> > > Firefox does not use the 16.X line - that's the Pepper API plugin which runs > with Chrome only. > I know that; what I meant was that I am waiting to see a similar message about the 11.x version that's used in Linux/Firefox. -- Ahmad Samir -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
