On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > With a change along those lines, I think we could plausibly look at > hard enforcement of the upgrade path, and it would be a good > improvement. It may be necessary to have *some* kind of override > mechanism for the case where we have a major security issue we > really need to fix in stable ASAP, and karma for Branched is lagging > behind. I should also note for completeness the other string to this debate: https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21 that would make the upgradepath issue more or less moot, as you can already use --distro-sync for yum/dnf upgrades. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
