Re: amending the new package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> 2015-01-21 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the
> > package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the
> > master branch will be approved.
> I share your concern about the pending list but self-review is not
> acceptable.
> Just licensing review itself would be a blocker to your proposal.

I don't understand what you mean above.

> But if we were to have a staging repository as suggested by Josh and
> Jaroslav, it could be something that we could consider.

I believe it is really orthogonal to the issue. A staging repository will
not solve the issue of adding a library which is a dependency of a package
in Fedora proper. Moreover if it works better than the process we currently
have, we end up having the staging repository always being added by the users,
defeating the purpose of the processes we set.

regards,
Nikos
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux