On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 21.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Yanko Kaneti: >> >> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 12:26 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Igor Gnatenko < >>> i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> + gnome-calendar >>>> btw gnome-2048 on review already >> >> >>> FWIW this one is not complete; maybe it will be ready for GNOME >>> 3.16, but I would expect it to be included in GNOME 3.18 instead. >> >> >> Its not the first and won't be the last software in Fedora that is not >> "complete". FWIW its perfectly playable. The crash on 4096 already has >> a pending patch. >> >>> I see it's already been packaged for Fedora, which is not really >>> good as it could create a poor first impression of the app for users >>> (e.g. there is no user help, no HC icon, it crashes when you get to >>> 2048). I'd rather hold off on this one until it's more mature >>> upstream. >> >> >> When did Fedora become the place which only welcomes mature software? >> IMHO what you seem to aspire to is somewhat in conflict with the >> release early, release often principle that is behind the "First" >> Fedora slogan > > > it's nice to have recent software, but not for every price, you should also > consider the time users spend to solve problems left and right in your > calculations if something is worth to be included or better wait > > frankly if i have the decision of something brand new with troubles or > something outdated doing it's daily job the decision is easy and ressources > are not only upstream and on the distribution side > > ressources are also on the users side because they lose will and energy of > testing and writing bugreports if they are too much to track This is just a game .... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
