On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:05:36PM +0000, Mike Hearn wrote: > when they're active. But please, have a more considerate attitude for > those of us that have sunk months into dealing with these sparkly new > features instead of writing things off as "bugs" which "should be fixed". Wine was always buggy, it made an assumption that the LSB, POSIX, and SuS didnt allow. That doesn't have a lot to do with whether people appreciate the amount of work required and done to resolve it. As to Cedega well if they want to be proprietary they have to fix their own bugs There isn't any danger of the arch setting stuff going away in a hurry, there is a lot of old proprietary stuff that needs this and nobody wants to break it pointlessly. The original proposal for default insecurity however is not good and quite different.
