>> >> I really wonder what is the state here. This is on my rawhide: >> > We strongly believe all the major problems will be resolved in time. Also, >> > as of last week we have one person dedicated to helping people with >> > porting their application and the rest of the developers focus mainly on >> > major usability issues. >> > >> > But still, I would appreciate more cooperation from the Fedora community. >> > Most of the package maintainers don't seem to care about this transition. >> > They didn't respond to the bugs that are filed against their components, >> > not even to direct emails we sent them offering help with the transition. >> >> All features are due to be complete in a month [1] but earlier in the >> thread it was said that some of the functionality isn't even written >> yet..... >> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule > > What date are you referring to? Is it "Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline > (testable)"? If yes then I don't see any problems. DNF has been testable for > quite some time and I invite people to test it. If you have some specific > needs, come and talk to us, work with us on a solution but please be open > minded at least a little. DNF is not yum and will therefore not behave the > same in every situation. To quote from the top of this thread: "ABRT uses yum and plenty of yum hacks to download debug packages. It isn't trivial to port our yum based code to dnf, but I can assure you this task is on our TODO list and it will bee fixed ASAP." Is that going to be done and QAed well in that time? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
