On 21/01/15 11:49, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > I don't have a solution to bring extra resources to reviewing (which > will be the ideal), but I'd like to propose an amendment to allow > bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case). > > Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the > package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the > master branch will be approved. > Ugh, thank you for trying to address our way-too-long review queue. I agree, the submitter should review their own submission, but this review should be ideally done before sending a package up for review through a second pair of eyes. Let's make an example, a submitter puts up a review containing copyrighted material; this should be caught during review process. Due the submitter will think, everything is alright, he will check that material into SCM and we'll start distributing that. Matthias -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
