On 01/20/2015 01:08 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 20/01/15 11:53, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > * Other developers: > > ** Add /tmp-inst and /var/tmp/tmp-inst to filesystem. (packagename: filesystem) > > ** Enable namespaces in /etc/security/namespace.conf (packagename: PAM) > > ** Enable proper selinux context and polyinstantiation_enabled boolean to be > > set (packagename: selinux-policy-targeted or selinux-policy) > > So this effectively reverses tmp-on-tmpfs for users other than root and adm > right? Because /tmp will actually be a subdirectory of /tmp-inst which will be a > real directory? > Why do you think this? I don't see any reason why the new tmp-inst directories can not be on tmpfs... > Incidentally, why /tmp-inst but /var/tmp/tmp-inst? Why not /tmp/tmp-inst for > /tmp or /var/tmp-inst for /var/tmp? Shouldn't the naming be consistent? > > Tom > Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
