Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit: > The soname didn't change. I reviewed the actual changes using abidiff, > and the only thing reported that I think is an actual ABI violation is > insertion of one virtual method. I don't think that's real however: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17861 Indeed, the reported insertion of the virtual method is a false positive resulting from a bug in abidiff. I have committed a change to abidiff that should fix that issue now. And I confirm that the other abi changes reported by abidiff do not represent ABI-incompatible changes. > So the current plan is to simply update TBB and not even bump and > rebuild clients, Assuming abidiff hasn't forgotten to report any ABI-incompatible change, this should work, yes. > but if you could take your packages for a spin with the > scratch builds, and report back, that would be great. Good plan. Cheers. -- Dodji -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct