On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:10:25 -0500 Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver > > I've been using unbound + dnssec-trigger on my laptop at home and > desktop at work since this was announced for F21. It works fine most > of the time, but there are occasionally issues with name resolution > that are "fixed" by restarting unbound. As another datapoint, I have been using it here for several years. (since the dnssec-trigger package landed). For the most part it's working fine. I ran into a issue with unbound crashing in rawhide a while back, but it was easy to downgrade and it was fixed up in a day or two by maintainers. I find dnssec-trigger-control and unbound-control occasionally very handy for making things reprobe or use a different server or flush cache. As far as I know dnsmasq lacks that kind of control. kevin
Attachment:
pgp5SySYEIlZw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct