Bah, "linux jfs selinux=0" works. I had to change the kernel params on these stations to root=/dev/sdf1 when it couldn't find the "/" label, but that worked. All eight drives are using JFS now. -Nick On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:49:00 -0500, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 10:41, Nick Bargnesi wrote: > > I was however able to install FC3 on these machines using a root > > partition of ext3 and jfs partitions not directly related to the FC3 > > directory structure, i.e., /opt, and some backup mount points. I've > > read about trying "linux jfs selinux=0" as jfs won't mingle with > > selinux, which I haven't done yet. Curious to see if anyone else is > > using non-ext filesystems and experienced/gotten past this. Or to > > smack me upside the head and say selinux=0 should do it... > > IBM just posted a JFS patch this morning to the selinux mailing list > that they said allows them to use SELinux with JFS on FC3. They said > that they are submitting it upstream soon, so hopefully SELinux and JFS > will play nicely with each other in the not-so-distant future. Also > requires a small patch to the policy configuration to tell SELinux that > it should try using xattrs on jfs for file contexts. > > -- > Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > National Security Agency > > -- Nick Bargnesi http://www.den-4.com Den 4 Software pub 1024D/E8BD2FD0 2004-12-02 Nick Bargnesi <nbargnesi@xxxxxxxxx> Key fingerprint = 6F9D 9404 63CD 2B04 DE7A 0F9D A1ED C1B0 E8BD 2FD0 sub 2048g/56C5D45B 2004-12-02