Re: against dnssec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 18.01.2015 um 03:43 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
in fact DNSSEC is the prerequisite for
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS-based_Authentication_of_Named_Entities
which has the potential to replace the horrible need of CA signed
certificates for SSL which are in fact *completly* unrelieable because
every random of the thousands entities your browsers trusts can sign any
random domain certificate

The article also addresses (or claims to address) that, claiming that DANE
only moves us from private cartel control to government control, which is
not necessarily an improvement.

uhm they control it now too

but now every random idiot finding a CA not verify the request can get a valid cert for your domain trusted by every browser - DANE is reducing the circle of persons able to do this and that *is* an improvment

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux