Re: against dnssec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That article is terrible. I will respond to it later. It is definitely not a valid reason to revisit the fedora feature. 

Paul

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 19:45, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I personally know nothing of the subject, but found this article, I wonder if 
> there's any truth here?  If so, maybe the push for dnssec on f22 isn't as 
> wonderful as supposed:
> 
> http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2015/01/15/against-dnssec/
> 
> -- 
> -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
> 
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux