On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:53:23 +0000 (UTC) > P J P <pj.pandit@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> IMO, the ones opposing are those who fear their current >> setups/practices would break. Because they need remote 'root' access >> in their set-up. Which is a genuine use-case. And to support it, we >> could provide an option to enable remote root access with >> 'PermitRootLogin=Yes', based on the the user's response to Anaconda >> at install time, as was suggested in previous email. However, let's >> not assume _all_ Fedora users have this use-case. > > Workstation do not even enable sshd (IIRC) so this impacts the server > images (cloud images already do their magic with sshd so I am not > counting them here), and server has different use cases and security > implications than a generic population. > Not just workstation, spin images, it's a decision pre-dating workstation. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct