-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:09 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B: > > Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches "no > > answer" as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an > > instant, that's it, result vanishes > > simply not true > > there is a *huge* difference between a NXDOMAIN response and not > reaching the NS, that said from somebody managing DNS and mail for > some hundret domains over many years > > That is the case, but unbound certainly likes to cache no response in it's negative cache in my experience. It treats them as equivalent. - -- Sincerely, William Brown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUtYJ+AAoJEO/EFteBqAmaEHEP/1xrnJoJgASCYNwByrYdyXU7 8lBYoZp4Cr9+oJXb/GuQqx+y9Dr4zWt8phQjg/osAYSLwTfbrD+2LxdGbPYWhv75 kBM09EEjEY85OwmU2dsdFNCcQ6ZHuybKmTvaWjo9eAsxQcLsD8Ksa7NcLV/DthqO STHTyz+TPA9HjP4uFnRcYy123bhVnUDFYpiUUBkuiF9Nidz3QxT6gvK7aqB5cRqy ib+CVGuPY5ahhNtXB0khpo+0tsetZ++9zIeh9XoVP6c2lNaK+eNHPb7Ef7Lhq2Ca qwXOrmsXWUhJMoTaRBUrCbpjw425WssIYwK6eZawpF6RTRwZhZLYTRiYSU8gBvyN ODoQ5rLHzZJ1Tw6eDFYLBG5o3smSMgUo4U41HEmNe87EtzPA1o1G0y+0BrORz28q q5hjdj9ynxIuBeyUybC4JHSiBfzC+z6nqv5FLC8GzJ8BxbDJfBJOdzwIZl3Mexhv qpNsI31g8ehxfPM6mQqyfMrd6Xkf1vPjBWhckmFUkLx/uPGfY/qIm76YK6sXRni1 Ck6lckpX70vPkw/wnj1m5qAu6MuZ3KkdRYxhNWhhfYOhwKbJ67GtM+iMGhQxt/Uq z4q62ZA/1YZOzSX25xxOIB7iOO+3U2uVoQGsekvTivGOZ4gGmRTu/1dj5DSS79lU TMpxq/+dHQGNm1aYkgqR =9QZk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
