On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:37:42PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > Does this proposal apply to native non-C/C++ programs? > > As written, it seems to intend so. In practice, it would probably > apply or not depending on whether the non-C/C++ programs’ builds are > affected by _hardened_build. I did not think of these programs, so I agree here. Addressing them is something for a future change proposal IMHO, unless there is enough time to to do for F22. > Ideally, I think this should apply to all languages that don’t ensure > memory safety, and not to those that do ensure it.¹ (There is also > the edge case of safe languages with explicit “unsafe” blocks, I guess > these should default into the “safe” category?) Mirek Is there a list of languages that need to be considered? There is afaik golang, ocaml and ghc that need to be considered. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
