On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2015-01-07, 14:13 GMT, Pete Travis wrote: >> While recognizing the massive maintenance burden of this COPR, I suspect >> the majority of objections will come from the enthusiast end user type - >> you know, the ones that are so eager to try the new thing they read about >> that they blow right past the description. This COPR received a lot of >> publicity; fedoramagazine articles, social media, blog posts, etc. > > Shouldn't such COPR be part of Rawhide anyway? What does that even mean? The packages where in rawhide at that time. The purpose of the COPR was to provide it to people who do *not* want to run rawhide. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
