On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:07:37PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:57:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >> You will need to convince a sponsor to sponsor you. > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group?rd=Extras/HowToGetSponsored > >> > >> Many sponsors like to see you put together a package for review or > >> 'pre' review existing packages in the review queue to show that you > >> know what you are doing. > > > > Btw, several sponsors have been burnt by someone new wanting to take over > > a single orphaned (or even deprecated) package, only to give up shortly > > afterwards without any notification. :( So, a positive attitude in > > general and not getting upset too easily by other changes in the dist is > > a plus if you are serious about becoming a contributor. > > I will take it back as I was an admin of this package. Incidentally, > should I go through the review process again? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure does not say anything like that. Kees, if you still decide to become a maintainer, when you get sponsored, you can apply for co-maintainership of ddclient. I'm sure cicku will be happy to have a second pair of hands. Best, Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
