Hi,
I have written here because the bug was already 5 month old without a
reaction and the package don't seem maintened (upstream is 0.43 and
fedora is 0.39 ).
I have follow your advice and made a request for epel7
Le 30/12/2014 16:09, Yanko Kaneti a écrit :
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53 +0100, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
A bug is open for perl-XML-TreePP since July (for opening a epel 7
branch) with no reaction
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123681)
I need this package so I'm volunteer to maintain it
This bug seems unnecessary. AFAIK all it takes to create a branch for a
package is a willing maintainer who's already a packager, in this case
you, to make a SCM request for it in the package review request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
Make sure to list yourself as a "owner" of the new branch.
Its perfectly understandable for a primary POC of a package on the
Fedora branches to not want to deal with the EPEL packaging.
Regards
Yanko
Hi,
I have written here because the bug is already 5 month old without a
reaction and the package don't seem maintained (upstream latest release
is 0.43 and fedora package is 0.39 ).
I have follow your advice and made a request for epel7.
Regards
Marianne
PS : please excuse the noise, I'm still a newbie packager
--
Marianne (Jehane) Lombard
Geekfeminist and sysadmin
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
