Re: config files obfuscation [was: Configuring NFS under Linux for Firewall control]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tor, 02.12.2004 kl. 16.01 skrev Phil Schaffner:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:02 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:22 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > I haven't BZ'd this since I wasn't sure if anyone agreed with my
> > > suggestion, but will do so if I can get a second on the motion.
> > 
> > I'm not sure about the details either, but overall this is what i was
> > talking about.
> > Perhaps don't leave the *PORT variables empty, but add sensible
> > values?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Florin Andrei
> 
> Sounded like a second to me.  Consider this an "All in favor say aye.
> Aye!" response.  Very nice start.  Have wished for other files commented
> as well as smb.conf, and agree that every config file should at least
> have a commented template.
> 
> Perhaps a new thread, noting your BZ RFE, and soliciting suggestions (or
> submitting more good examples) for other /etc/... files that deserve
> this treatment is in order.
> 
> Phil
> 

Aye!

Comment'em
vsftpd.conf is also quite good, but is lacking *some* details.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux