Am 20.12.2014 um 17:33 schrieb john.tiger:
I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party available for F21 is not acceptable
for whom?
ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet thunderbird, dnf, etc is ... - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at drivers.net.wireless/ath/ath9k.recv
which implies a completly unrelated problem you stripped that error message and should write a bugreport
point is, browser choice is important
there are enough browsers available for Fedora not only FF
and Chromium on my F20 is working
but that's not really related to Fdora
Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers.
really? than you need virtual machines for different MSIE anyways also Google as a 3rd party repo for Chrome google-chrome-stable-39.0.2171.95-1.x86_64
Even if Fedora does not elect to maintain packages for Chromium, there should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party or fix whatever package might be holding up someone else from implementing it (ie if it's clang compiling or whatever.
chromium upstream has to make that effort or even *you*
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
